Promoção da Inovação Social por Meio do Desenvolvimento Neoendógeno: O Caso da Região Austríaca de MuehLviertel
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59072/rper.vi59.90Palavras-chave:
inovação social, desenvolvimento neo-endógeneo, regiões rurais, grupos de acção local, AustriaResumo
Dado o seu foco em aumentar a participação, fomenter processos de decisão, e ir ao encontro de desafios locais, a inovação social (IS) partilha algumas características com a idea de desenvolvimento neo-endógeneo, cuja matriz assenta na utilização de recursos e conhecimentos locais e a sua ligação com contextos mais gerais. Através da investigação do caso da região Austríaca de Muehlviertel, este artigo procura analisar as formas como a inovação social pode ser promovida em regiões que praticam formas de desenvolvimento rural neo-endógeneas. Partindo dos dados empíricos recolhidos na região, o artigo conclui que os processos de IS estão alicerçados numa abordagem neo-endógenea ao desenvolvimento da região, criando redes que abarcam todo o território com múltiplos stakeholders, e na qual actividades bottom-up são suportadas e estimuladas. No entanto, o artigo também aponta alguns perigos presentes na acção dos actores regionais na tentativa de promover IS, quer ao nível de limitações burocráticas quer na resistência à inovação.
Referências
Armstrong, H. & Taylor, J. (2000). Regional economics and policy. Wiley-Blackwell.
Beer, A., Maude, A. & Pritchard, W. (2003). Developing Australia's Regions: Theory & Practice.
UNSW Press.
BEPA (2010). Empowering People, Driving Change. Social Innovation in the European Union.
Brussels: Bureau of European Policy Advisors and European Commission.
Biczkowski, M. (2020). LEADER as a mechanism of neo-endogenous development of rural areas: the case of Poland. Miscellanea Geographica, 1(ahead-of-print). DOI: 10.2478/mgrsd-2020-0041.
Bock, B.B. (2016). Rural marginalisation and the role of social innovation; a turn towards nexoge- nous development and rural reconnection. Sociologia Ruralis, 56(4), pp.552-573. DOI: 10.1111/soru.12119.
Bosworth, G., Annibal, I., Carroll, T., Price, L., Sellick, J. & Shepherd, J. (2016). Empowering Local Action through Neo‐Endogenous Development; The Case of LEADER in England. Sociologia Ruralis, 56(3), pp.427-449. DOI:10.1111/soru.12089.
Bosworth, G., Price, L., Hakulinen, V. & Marango, S. (2020). Rural Social Innovation and Neo- endogenous Rural Development. In Cejudo, E.& Navarro, F. (eds.), Neoendogenous Development in European Rural Areas (pp. 21-32). Springer International Publishing.
Bosworth, G., Rizzo, F., Marquardt, D., Strijker, D., Haartsen, T. & Aagaard Thuesen, A. (2016). Identifying social innovations in European local rural development initiatives. Innovation: The Euro- pean Journal of Social Science Research, 29(4), pp.442-461. DOI: 10.1080/13511610.2016.1176555.
Braun, V. & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psy- chology, 3(2), pp. 77-101. DOI: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
Butkevičienė, E. (2009). Social innovations in rural communities: methodological framework and empirical evidence. Socialiniai mokslai, (1), pp.80-88.
Chatzichristos, G. & Nagopoulos, N. (2020). Regional Institutional Arenas for Social Innovation: A Mixed Methods Research. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, pp.1-23. DOI: 10.1080/19420676.2019.1705378.
Christmann, G.B.(2020). Introduction: struggling with innovations. Social innovations and conflicts in urban development and planning. European Planning Studies, 28(3), pp. 423-433. DOI: 10.1080/09654313.2019.1639396.
Convery, I., Soane, I., Dutson, T. & Shaw, H. (2010). Mainstreaming LEADER delivery of the RDR in Cumbria: an interpretative phenomenological analysis. Sociologia Ruralis, 50(4), pp. 370-391. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9523.2010.00519.x.
Copus, A., Perjo, L., Berlina, A., Jungsberg, L., Randall, L. & Sigurjónsdóttir, H.R. (2017). Social innovation in local development: Lessons from the Nordic countries and Scotland. (Nordregio Working Paper). Stockholm: Nordregio. Online at: http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:norden:org:diva- 4820 (accessed: 12 November 2020).
Dargan, L. & Shucksmith, M. (2008). LEADER and innovation. Sociologia Ruralis, 48(3), pp. 274- 291. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9523.2008.00463.x.
Dax, T., Strahl, W., Kirwan, J. & Maye, D. (2016). The Leader programme 2007–2013: Enabling or disabling social innovation and neo-endogenous development? Insights from Austria and Ireland. Eu- ropean Urban and Regional Studies, 23(1), pp. 56-68. DOI: 10.1177/0969776413490425.
Dax, T. & Fischer, M. (2018). An alternative policy approach to rural development in regions facing population decline. European Planning Studies, 26(2), pp. 297-315. DOI: 10.1080/09654313.2017.1361596.
Di Iacovo, F., Moruzzo, R. & Rossignoli, C.M. (2017). Collaboration, knowledge and innovation toward a welfare society: the case of the Board of Social Farming in Valdera (Tuscany), Italy. The Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension, 23(4), pp. 289-311. DOI: 10.1080/1389224X.2017.1302889.
Eder, J. (2019). Innovation in the periphery: A critical survey and research agenda. International Regional Science Review, 42(2), pp.119-146. DOI: 10.1177/0160017618764279.
Esparcia, J. (2014). Innovation and networks in rural areas. An analysis from European innovative projects. Journal of Rural Studies, 34, pp.1-14. DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2013.12.004.
European Commission (2013). Social innovation research in the EU: approaches, findings and future directions, Policy Review: 64. Online at: https://ec.europa.eu/research/social- sciences/pdf/policy_re- views/social_innovation.pdf (accessed: 26 October 2020).
Eurostat, (2016). Rural development statistics by urban-rural typology. Online at: https://ec.eu- ropa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=Archive:Rural_development_statistics_by_urban- rural_typology&oldid=294503 (accessed: 15 November 2019).
Eurostat, (2018). Statistics on rural areas in the EU. Online at: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics- explained/index.php?title=Statistics_on_rural_areas_in_the_EU&oldid=391832 (accessed: 23 Novem- ber 2020).
Eurostat, (2019). Database. Online at: ec.europa.eu/eurostat/data/database (accessed: 25 October 2019)
Gkartzios, M. & Lowe, P. (2019). Revisiting neo-endogenous rural development. In Scott, M., Gal- lent, N.& Gkartzios, M. (eds.) The Routledge companion to rural planning (pp. 159-169). Routledge.
Gobattoni, F., Pelorosso, R., Leone, A. & Ripa, M.N. (2015). Sustainable rural development: The role of traditional activities in Central Italy. Land Use Policy, 48, pp. 412-427. DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.06.013.
van der Ploeg, J.D. & van Dijk, G. (1995). Beyond Modernisation: The Impact of Endogenous Rural Development. Assen: Van Gorcum.
Labianca, M., De Rubertis, S., Belliggiano, A. & Salento, A. (2016). Innovation in rural development in Puglia, Italy: critical issues and potentialities starting from empirical evidence. Studies in Agricultural Economics, 118(1316-2016-102852), pp. 38-46. DOI: 10.7896/j.1531.
Lombardi, M. (2017). L’innovazione sociale nel settore agricolo del Mezzogiorno. Collana Agricol- tura e Benessere. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
Lombardi, M., Lopolito, A., Andriano, A.M., Prosperi, M., Stasi, A. & Iannuzzi, E. (2020). Network impact of social innovation initiatives in marginalised rural communities. Social Networks, 63, pp. 11- 20. DOI: 10.1016/j.socnet.2020.04.001.
Madureira, L. & Torre, A. (2019). Innovation processes in rural areas. Regional Science Policy and Practice, 11, pp. 213–218. DOI: 10.1111/rsp3.12215.
Marini Govigli, V., Alkhaled, S., Arnesen, T., Barlagne, C., Bjerck, M., Burlando, C., Melnykovych, M., Rodríguez Fernandez-Blanco, C., Sfeir, P. & Górriz-Mifsud, E. (2020). Testing a Framework to Co- Construct Social Innovation Actions: Insights from Seven Marginalized Rural Areas. Sustainability, 12(4), p.1441. DOI:10.3390/su12041441.
Maye, D., Kirwan, J. & Simpson, R. (2010). New modes of LEADER governance in Ireland. RuDI report, Work package 8, Cheltenham. Cheltenham: Countryside and Community Research Institute.
Mieg, H.A. & Töpfer, K. (eds.) (2013). Institutional and social innovation for sustainable urban development. Routledge.
Moulaert, F., MacCallum, D. and Hillier, J., (2013). Social innovation: intuition, precept, concept. in Moulaert, F., MacCallum, D., Mehmood, A. & Hamdouch, A. (eds.), The International Handbook on Social Innovation: Collective Action, Social Learning and Transdisciplinary Research (pp. 13-24). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Moulaert, F., Martinelli, F., Swyngedouw, E. & Gonzalez, S. (2005). Towards alternative model (s) of local innovation. Urban studies, 42(11), pp. 1969-1990. DOI: 10.1080=00420980500279893.
Neumeier, S. (2012). Why do social innovations in rural development matter and should they be considered more seriously in rural development research?–Proposal for a stronger focus on social inno- vations in rural development research. Sociologia ruralis, 52(1), pp. 48-69. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467- 9523.2011.00553.x.
Neumeier, S. (2017). Social innovation in rural development: identifying the key factors of success.
The geographical journal, 183(1), pp. 34-46. DOI: 10.1111/geoj.12180.
Nordberg, K., Mariussen, Å. & Virkkala, S. (2020). Community-driven social innovation and quad- ruple helix coordination in rural development. Case study on LEADER group Aktion Österbotten. Jour- nal of Rural Studies, 79, pp. 157-168. DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2020.08.001.
Noy, C. (2008). Sampling knowledge: The hermeneutics of snowball sampling in qualitative re- search. International Journal of social research methodology, 11(4), pp.327-344. DOI: 10.1080/13645570701401305.
OECD, (2006). Policy Brief: Reinventing Rural Policy. Paris: OECD.
Pike, A., Rodríguez-Pose, A. and Tomaney, J. (eds.) (2016). Local and Regional Development: Crit- ical Concepts in Geography. Routledge.
Ray, C. (2000). The EU LEADER programme: rural development laboratory. Sociologia ruralis, 40(2), pp. 163-171.
Ray, C. (2001). Transnational co‐operation between rural areas: elements of a political economy of EU rural development. Sociologia ruralis, 41(3), pp. 279-295.
Ray, C. (2006). Neo-endogenous rural development in the EU. In Cloke, P., Marsden, T. & Mooney,
P. (eds.), Handbook of rural studies (pp.278-291). SAGE Publications Ltd.
Shucksmith, M. (2010). Disintegrated rural development? Neo‐endogenous rural development, plan- ning and place‐shaping in diffused power contexts. Sociologia ruralis, 50(1), pp. 1-14. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9523.2009.00497.x.
Slee, B. (2019). An inductive classification of types of social innovation. Scottish Affairs, 28(2), pp.152-176. DOI: 10.3366/scot.2019.0275.
Tomaney, J., Pike, A. & Rodriques-Pose, A. (2011). Local and regional development, in Pike, A., Rodriguez-Pose, A. &, Tomaney, J. (eds.), Handbook of local and regional development (pp. 618-630). Routledge.
Vercher, N., Barlagne, C., Hewitt, R., Nijnik, M. & Esparcia, J. (2021). Whose Narrative is it Any- way? Narratives of Social Innovation in Rural Areas–A Comparative Analysis of Community‐Led Ini- tiatives in Scotland and Spain. Sociologia Ruralis, 61(1), pp. 163-189. DOI: 10.1111/soru.12321.
Živojinović, I., Weiss, G., Wilding, M., Wong, J.L.G. & Ludvig, A. (2020). Experiencing forest products–An innovation trend by rural entrepreneurs. Land Use Policy, 94, p. 104506. DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104506.
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Secção
Licença
Direitos de Autor (c) 2021 RPER
Este trabalho encontra-se publicado com a Creative Commons Atribuição-NãoComercial 4.0.
A RPER é o jornal oficial da 