How Do Subnational Governments Contribute to Territorial Development? An Exploratory Analysis of Public Goods and Services Provided by Uruguay's Departmental Governments
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59072/rper.vi75.858Keywords:
Territorial Development, Subnational Governments, Public Goods and Services, Mixed-Methods Approach, UruguayAbstract
This article analyzes the contribution of subnational governments to territorial development through the study of public goods and services provided by Departmental Governments in Uruguay. Although they execute only around 10% of the national budget, they hold significant responsibilities in areas such as land use, local transportation, and primary healthcare. However, their actual capacity to influence development varies across departments.
Based on the Regional Development Index for Uruguay, this study develops a pilot methodology to construct the Local Provision of Public Goods and Services Index, composed of two dimensions: the degree of autonomy with which Departmental Governments provide public goods and services, and the budgetary priority assigned to different dimensions of development. The methodology is applied to two case studies—Rivera and San José—selected due to their differing levels of development.
The results show a strong correlation between higher levels of autonomy in local public goods and services provision and improvements in territorial development indicators, particularly in social cohesion and economic activity. It is concluded that effective autonomy, even with limited resources, could be a key factor in promoting more equitable territorial development. The approach requires further validation in future research.
References
Abdurrahman, B. (2023). Challenges of defining public services as the object of state administration activity. Interdisciplinary Journal of Research and Development, 10(1), Article 106. https://doi.org/10.56345/ijrdv10n1s106
Abreu, M., Comim, F., & Jones, C. (2024). A capability approach perspective on regional development. Regional Studies, 58(11). https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2023.2276332
Alburquerque, F., Ferraro, C., & Costamagna, P. (2008). Desarrollo económico local, descentralización y democracia: Ideas para un cambio. UNSAM.
Alkire, S. (2010). Human development: Definitions, critiques, and related concepts. Human Development Research Paper (UNDP/HDRO), 2010/01.
Aroca, P., & Azzoni, C. (2021). Regional development in Latin America. Regional Science Policy & Practice, 13(4), 1094–1095.
Bakvis, H. (2021). Federalism and multilevel governance. In Handbook of public administration (pp. 147–168). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429270680-9
Bello-Gómez, R. A. (2020). Interacting capacities: The indirect national contribution to subnational service provision. Public Administration Review, 80(2), 264–276. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13192
Chepkorir, C., & Omwenga, J. Q. (2023). Intergovernmental relations and public service delivery in Kisii County. The Strategic Journal of Business & Change Management, 10(2), 942–959. https://doi.org/10.61426/sjbcm.v10i2.2643
Clark, D. A., Biggeri, M., & Frediani, A. A. (2019). The capability approach, empowerment and participation: Concepts, methods and applications. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-35230-9
Cox, K. (2020). Public goods. In International encyclopedia of human geography (2nd ed., pp. 89–93). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-08-102295-5.10689-4
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (2018). The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Dörffel, C., & Schuhmann, S. (2022). What is inclusive development? Introducing the multidimensional inclusiveness index. Social Indicators Research, 160, 769–804. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-021-02860-y
ECLAC. (2025). Panorama del desarrollo territorial en América Latina y el Caribe 2024: Nuevas capacidades para la transformación territorial. ECLAC.
EUROSTAT. (2011). European statistics code of practice.
Ferraz, D., Mariano, E. B., Rebelatto, D., & Hartmann, D. (2020). Linking human development and the financial responsibility of regions: Combined index proposals using methods from data envelopment analysis. Social Indicators Research, 150, 439–478. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-020-02338-3
Filip, D., & Setzer, R. (2025). The impact of regional institutional quality on economic growth and resilience in the EU (ECB Working Paper No. 2025/3045). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5201333
Flick, U. (2018). An introduction to qualitative research (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Freigedo, M., & Goinheix, S. (2019). Análisis del nivel de autonomía de los gobiernos departamentales en Uruguay. In Descentralización en Uruguay: Propuestas para avanzar en la agenda (pp. 13–32). Fundación Konrad Adenauer.
Freigedo, M., & Goinheix, S. (2021). Local autonomy index for Uruguay.
Freigedo, M., Milanesi, A., & Bidegain, G. (2019). ¿Más descentralización, más representación? Evidencia de municipios uruguayos. Teoria e Cultura, 14(2), 55–72. https://doi.org/10.34019/2318-101x.2019.v14.14091
Freigedo, M., Milanesi, A., & Fuentes, G. (2017). Invirtiendo la secuencia: El proceso de descentralización uruguayo bajo gobiernos de izquierda (2005–2015). Revista Iberoamericana de Estudios Municipales, 16, 9–36. https://doi.org/10.32457/riem.vi16.335
Garcilazo, E., & McCann, P. (2025). The case for place-based policy: Economic divergence, governance integrity and climate change mitigation. Regional Studies, 59(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2025.2485126
Heide, M., & Heijman, W. (2019). A public good perspective on the rural environment: Theory and history. In Palgrave advances in bioeconomy: Economics and policies (pp. 131–152). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28642-2_7
Hernández, J., Vial, C., & Moller, F. (2022). Gestión pública subnacional y desarrollo territorial: Análisis de los gobiernos departamentales de Colombia. Revista Venezolana de Gerencia, 27(100).
Iddawela, Y., Lee, N., & Rodríguez-Pose, A. (2021). Quality of sub-national government and regional development in Africa. The Journal of Development Studies, 57(8), 1282–1302. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220388.2021.1873286
Kopiński, D., Nowicki, M., & Wróblewski, M. (2023). IMF and global public goods: Seeking a new role in the global economy. Ekonomia Międzynarodowa, 42, 19–42. https://doi.org/10.18778/2082-4440.42.02
Kurian, M. (2025). Implementation and challenges of multi-level governance in the Western Balkans (Sigma Papers). OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/32891a8f-en
Kyriacou, A. P., Muinelo-Gallo, L., & Roca-Sagalés, O. (2017). Fiscal decentralization and regional disparities: The importance of good governance. Papers in Regional Science, 94(1), 89–108.
Lutsiv, I. (2021). Doctrinal definitions of the concept of “public services”. Social & Legal Studios, 4(2), 19–25. https://doi.org/10.32518/2617-4162-2021-2-19-25
Midaglia, C., Castillo, M., & Freigedo, M. (2011). Mapeo de iniciativas en clave de políticas públicas. In Uruguay Integra: Aportes y reflexiones para la agenda nacional de descentralización. OPP.
Morretta, V. (2020). Territorial capital in local economic endogenous development. Regional Science Policy & Practice, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.1111/rsp3.12317
Muinelo-Gallo, L., & Rodríguez-Miranda, A. (2014). Descentralización fiscal, calidad de gestión de gobierno y disparidades regionales en Uruguay. Estudios de Economía, 41(2), 219–250.
Muinelo-Gallo, L., & Rodríguez-Miranda, A. (2019). Finanzas subnacionales y capacidades para el desarrollo económico territorial en Uruguay. In J. Hernández, J. Orihuela, & H. Willebald (Eds.), México y Uruguay ante la Gran Recesión. Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Hidalgo.
Musgrave, R. A. (1939). The voluntary exchange theory of public economy. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 53, 213–237.
Nijkamp, P. (2016). The resourceful region: A new conceptualisation of regional development strategies. Journal of Regional Research, 36, 191–214.
OECD. (2008). Handbook on constructing composite indicators: Methodology and user guide. OECD & JRC European Commission.
Otero-Bahamón, S. (2020). Place-sensitive policies in the provision of subnational public goods in Colombia. Latin American Politics and Society, 62(3), 94–117. https://doi.org/10.1017/lap.2020.8
Perdomo, J., Phélan Casanova, M., & Levy-Carciente, S. (2021). Sustainable wellbeing operationalization and measurement based on the capabilities approach: The case of Latin America. Sustainability, 13(21), 12202. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132112202
Pérez, M. (2024). ¿Juntos a la par?: Crecimiento económico y desarrollo. Un estudio para los departamentos de Uruguay [Master’s thesis, Universidad de la República].
Rocca, I., Franco, J., & Maeso, I. (2024). Finanzas departamentales en Uruguay: Implicancias en la desigualdad y el desarrollo territorial. Documento presentado en las Jornadas de Economía, Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y de Administración, Universidad de la República.
Rodríguez, J. (2024). ¿Cómo inciden las relaciones intergubernamentales en los modelos de gestión de los gobiernos subnacionales? Revista Uruguaya de Ciencia Política, 33, Article 19. https://doi.org/10.26851/rucp.33.19
Rodríguez-Miranda, A. (2014). Desarrollo económico y disparidades territoriales en Uruguay (Cuaderno 03, Serie El Futuro en Foco). PNUD.
Rodríguez-Miranda, A., & Vial, C. (2021). Medición y agenda para el desarrollo territorial en América Latina: El Índice de Desarrollo Regional LATAM. Universidad Autónoma de Chile.
Rodríguez-Miranda, A., Vial, C., & Centurión, I. (2024). Índice de desarrollo regional Uruguay. Universidad de la República.
Rodríguez-Miranda, A., Vial, C., & Parrao, A. (2021). Índice compuesto y multidimensional de desarrollo regional: Una propuesta para América Latina. Revista Iberoamericana de Estudios Municipales, 23(1), 1–33.
Seo, S. (2020). The economics of global-scale public goods: Key challenges and theories. In The economics of globally shared and public goods (pp. 51–80). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-819658-8.00003-2
Sen, A. (1999). Desarrollo y libertad. Planeta.
Siswidiyanto, & Sahputri, R. A. M. (2023). Decentralisation and human development in Indonesia: The importance of local government capacity in delivering development outputs and outcomes. Lex Localis – Journal of Local Self-Government, 21(2), 393–419. https://doi.org/10.4335/21.2.393-419(2023)
Thiel, A., Blomquist, W., & Garrick, D. E. (Eds.). (2019). Governing complexity: Analyzing and applying polycentricity. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108325721
Tong, X.-Z. (2022). An exploration of Elinor Ostrom’s theory of self-governance. SHS Web of Conferences, 148, 01003. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202214801003
Vázquez-Barquero, A., & Rodríguez-Cohard, J. C. (2019). Local development in a global world: Challenges and opportunities. Regional Science Policy & Practice, 11, 885–897.
Young, D. (2021). Government failure theory. In Economics for nonprofit managers and social entrepreneurs (pp. 329–348). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780367696559-22
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
RPER is the official journal of the 